Public
Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound (CEUS) — Public Tier
(3 scenes)Full-access development tier with all data visible.
What you get
Measurements (y), ideal forward operator (H), spec ranges, ground truth (x_true), and true mismatch spec.
How to use
Load HDF5 → compare reconstruction vs x_true → check consistency → iterate.
What to submit
Reconstructed signals (x_hat) and corrected spec as HDF5.
Parameter Specifications
✓
True spec visible — use these exact values for Scenario III oracle reconstruction.
| Parameter | Spec Range | True Value | Unit |
|---|---|---|---|
| bubble_concentration | -1.0 – 2.0 | 0.5 | relative |
| nonlinear_harmonic_extraction | -2.0 – 4.0 | 1.0 | - |
| motion_between_frames | -1.0 – 2.0 | 0.5 | mm |
InverseNet Baseline Scores
Method: CPU_baseline — Mismatch parameter: nominal
Scenario I (Ideal)
17.61 dB
SSIM 0.3262
Scenario II (Mismatch)
13.39 dB
SSIM 0.0553
Scenario III (Oracle)
16.66 dB
SSIM 0.1359
Per-scene breakdown (4 scenes)
| Scene | PSNR I | SSIM I | PSNR II | SSIM II | PSNR III | SSIM III |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| scene_00 | 16.58 | 0.3251 | 12.85 | 0.0515 | 16.16 | 0.1317 |
| scene_01 | 18.88 | 0.3252 | 14.12 | 0.0562 | 17.37 | 0.1299 |
| scene_02 | 18.30 | 0.3298 | 13.74 | 0.0603 | 16.95 | 0.1425 |
| scene_03 | 16.68 | 0.3248 | 12.85 | 0.0534 | 16.15 | 0.1394 |
Public Tier Leaderboard
| # | Method | Score | PSNR | SSIM | Consistency | Trust | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | SUPER-ULM + gradient | 0.849 | 36.8 | 0.977 | 0.95 | ✓ Certified | Rigo et al., IEEE TUFFC 2023 |
| 2 | DiffusionCEUS + gradient | 0.842 | 37.28 | 0.979 | 0.89 | ✓ Certified | Chen et al., Nat. Methods 2024 |
| 3 | CEUSF-Transformer + gradient | 0.819 | 35.48 | 0.971 | 0.88 | ✓ Certified | Huang et al., IEEE TMI 2023 |
| 4 | PINN-CEUS + gradient | 0.803 | 34.21 | 0.962 | 0.88 | ✓ Certified | Lowerison et al., Nat. Commun. 2022 |
| 5 | ULM-Net + gradient | 0.787 | 32.27 | 0.946 | 0.93 | ✓ Certified | Christensen-Jeffries et al., Nat. Biomed. Eng. 2020 |
| 6 | DeepULM + gradient | 0.782 | 32.35 | 0.946 | 0.9 | ✓ Certified | van Sloun et al., IEEE TUFFC 2021 |
| 7 | CNN-Bubble + gradient | 0.704 | 27.68 | 0.874 | 0.89 | ✓ Certified | Youn et al., IEEE TUFFC 2020 |
| 8 | AM-CEUS + gradient | 0.642 | 24.27 | 0.778 | 0.94 | ✓ Certified | Mor-Avi et al., JACC 2002 |
| 9 | Pulse-Inversion + gradient | 0.574 | 22.13 | 0.696 | 0.87 | ✓ Certified | Simpson et al., Ultrasound Med. Biol. 1999 |
Visible Data Fields
y
H_ideal
spec_ranges
x_true
true_spec
Dataset
Format: HDF5
Scenes: 3
Scoring Formula
0.4 × PSNR_norm + 0.4 × SSIM + 0.2 × (1 − ‖y − Ĥx̂‖/‖y‖)
PSNR: 40%
SSIM: 40%
Consistency: 20%