CEST MRI
CEST MRI
Standard reconstruction benchmark — forward model perfectly known, no calibration needed. Score = 0.5 × clip((PSNR−15)/30, 0, 1) + 0.5 × SSIM
| # | Method | Score | PSNR (dB) | SSIM | Source | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🥇 |
DiffusionCEST
DiffusionCEST Chen 2024
39.7 dB
SSIM 0.961
Checkpoint unavailable
|
0.892 | 39.7 | 0.961 | ✓ Certified | Chen 2024 |
| 🥈 |
PromptCEST
PromptCEST Liu 2024
38.6 dB
SSIM 0.951
Checkpoint unavailable
|
0.869 | 38.6 | 0.951 | ✓ Certified | Liu 2024 |
| 🥉 |
CESTFormer
CESTFormer Wu 2023
37.4 dB
SSIM 0.940
Checkpoint unavailable
|
0.843 | 37.4 | 0.940 | ✓ Certified | Wu 2023 |
| 4 |
PINN-CEST
PINN-CEST Cohen 2022
35.9 dB
SSIM 0.925
Checkpoint unavailable
|
0.811 | 35.9 | 0.925 | ✓ Certified | Cohen 2022 |
| 5 |
U-Net-CEST
U-Net-CEST Zhao 2021
34.8 dB
SSIM 0.912
Checkpoint unavailable
|
0.786 | 34.8 | 0.912 | ✓ Certified | Zhao 2021 |
| 6 |
DnCNN-CEST
DnCNN-CEST Zhang 2017
32.1 dB
SSIM 0.878
Checkpoint unavailable
|
0.724 | 32.1 | 0.878 | ✓ Certified | Zhang 2017 |
| 7 | WASSR | 0.640 | 28.5 | 0.831 | ✓ Certified | Kim 2009 |
| 8 | Lorentzian-Fit | 0.607 | 27.2 | 0.808 | ✓ Certified | Zaiss 2013 |
| 9 | MTR-asym | 0.544 | 24.8 | 0.761 | ✓ Certified | Zhou 2003 |
Dataset: PWM Benchmark (9 algorithms)
Blind Reconstruction Challenge — forward model has unknown mismatch, must calibrate from data. Score = 0.4 × PSNR_norm + 0.4 × SSIM + 0.2 × (1 − ‖y − Ĥx̂‖/‖y‖)
| # | Method | Overall Score | Public PSNR / SSIM |
Dev PSNR / SSIM |
Hidden PSNR / SSIM |
Trust | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 🥇 | PromptCEST + gradient | 0.771 |
0.830
36.35 dB / 0.975
|
0.770
32.52 dB / 0.948
|
0.713
28.35 dB / 0.888
|
✓ Certified | Liu et al., MRM 2024 |
| 🥈 | CESTFormer + gradient | 0.758 |
0.817
35.62 dB / 0.971
|
0.755
30.94 dB / 0.930
|
0.702
27.86 dB / 0.878
|
✓ Certified | Wu et al., IEEE TMI 2023 |
| 🥉 | DiffusionCEST + gradient | 0.747 |
0.843
37.67 dB / 0.981
|
0.715
29.51 dB / 0.909
|
0.683
27.72 dB / 0.875
|
✓ Certified | Chen et al., NeurIPS 2024 |
| 4 | PINN-CEST + gradient | 0.739 |
0.793
33.19 dB / 0.954
|
0.724
28.89 dB / 0.898
|
0.700
27.64 dB / 0.873
|
✓ Certified | Cohen et al., MRM 2022 |
| 5 | U-Net-CEST + gradient | 0.695 |
0.783
32.82 dB / 0.951
|
0.681
27.22 dB / 0.863
|
0.620
24.54 dB / 0.787
|
✓ Certified | Zhao et al., MRM 2021 |
| 6 | WASSR + gradient | 0.662 |
0.668
25.68 dB / 0.823
|
0.661
26.3 dB / 0.840
|
0.657
26.12 dB / 0.835
|
✓ Certified | Kim et al., MRM 2009 |
| 7 | Lorentzian-Fit + gradient | 0.640 |
0.652
25.43 dB / 0.815
|
0.641
25.29 dB / 0.811
|
0.627
24.75 dB / 0.794
|
✓ Certified | Zaiss & Bachert, NMR Biomed. 2013 |
| 8 |
DnCNN-CEST + gradient
DnCNN-CEST + gradient Zhang et al., IEEE TIP 2017 (CEST adapted) Score 0.611
Correct & Reconstruct →
|
0.611 |
0.739
29.62 dB / 0.911
|
0.596
23.15 dB / 0.737
|
0.497
19.77 dB / 0.588
|
✓ Certified | Zhang et al., IEEE TIP 2017 (CEST adapted) |
| 9 | MTR-asym + gradient | 0.570 |
0.590
22.67 dB / 0.718
|
0.578
22.08 dB / 0.693
|
0.543
21.04 dB / 0.647
|
✓ Certified | Zhou et al., Nat. Med. 2003 |
Complete score requires all 3 tiers (Public + Dev + Hidden).
Join the competition →Full-access development tier with all data visible.
What you get & how to use
What you get: Measurements (y), ideal forward operator (H), spec ranges, ground truth (x_true), and true mismatch spec.
How to use: Load HDF5 → compare reconstruction vs x_true → check consistency → iterate.
What to submit: Reconstructed signals (x_hat) and corrected spec as HDF5.
Public Leaderboard
| # | Method | Score | PSNR | SSIM |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | DiffusionCEST + gradient | 0.843 | 37.67 | 0.981 |
| 2 | PromptCEST + gradient | 0.830 | 36.35 | 0.975 |
| 3 | CESTFormer + gradient | 0.817 | 35.62 | 0.971 |
| 4 | PINN-CEST + gradient | 0.793 | 33.19 | 0.954 |
| 5 | U-Net-CEST + gradient | 0.783 | 32.82 | 0.951 |
| 6 | DnCNN-CEST + gradient | 0.739 | 29.62 | 0.911 |
| 7 | WASSR + gradient | 0.668 | 25.68 | 0.823 |
| 8 | Lorentzian-Fit + gradient | 0.652 | 25.43 | 0.815 |
| 9 | MTR-asym + gradient | 0.590 | 22.67 | 0.718 |
Spec Ranges (4 parameters)
| Parameter | Min | Max | Unit |
|---|---|---|---|
| b0_inhomogeneity | -10.0 | 20.0 | Hz |
| b1_inhomogeneity | -4.0 | 8.0 | - |
| saturation_power_error | -2.0 | 4.0 | - |
| mt_contamination | -6.0 | 12.0 | - |
Blind evaluation tier — no ground truth available.
What you get & how to use
What you get: Measurements (y), ideal forward operator (H), and spec ranges only.
How to use: Apply your pipeline from the Public tier. Use consistency as self-check.
What to submit: Reconstructed signals and corrected spec. Scored server-side.
Dev Leaderboard
| # | Method | Score | PSNR | SSIM |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | PromptCEST + gradient | 0.770 | 32.52 | 0.948 |
| 2 | CESTFormer + gradient | 0.755 | 30.94 | 0.93 |
| 3 | PINN-CEST + gradient | 0.724 | 28.89 | 0.898 |
| 4 | DiffusionCEST + gradient | 0.715 | 29.51 | 0.909 |
| 5 | U-Net-CEST + gradient | 0.681 | 27.22 | 0.863 |
| 6 | WASSR + gradient | 0.661 | 26.3 | 0.84 |
| 7 | Lorentzian-Fit + gradient | 0.641 | 25.29 | 0.811 |
| 8 | DnCNN-CEST + gradient | 0.596 | 23.15 | 0.737 |
| 9 | MTR-asym + gradient | 0.578 | 22.08 | 0.693 |
Spec Ranges (4 parameters)
| Parameter | Min | Max | Unit |
|---|---|---|---|
| b0_inhomogeneity | -12.0 | 18.0 | Hz |
| b1_inhomogeneity | -4.8 | 7.2 | - |
| saturation_power_error | -2.4 | 3.6 | - |
| mt_contamination | -7.2 | 10.8 | - |
Fully blind server-side evaluation — no data download.
What you get & how to use
What you get: No data downloadable. Algorithm runs server-side on hidden measurements.
How to use: Package algorithm as Docker container / Python script. Submit via link.
What to submit: Containerized algorithm accepting y + H, outputting x_hat + corrected spec.
Hidden Leaderboard
| # | Method | Score | PSNR | SSIM |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | PromptCEST + gradient | 0.713 | 28.35 | 0.888 |
| 2 | CESTFormer + gradient | 0.702 | 27.86 | 0.878 |
| 3 | PINN-CEST + gradient | 0.700 | 27.64 | 0.873 |
| 4 | DiffusionCEST + gradient | 0.683 | 27.72 | 0.875 |
| 5 | WASSR + gradient | 0.657 | 26.12 | 0.835 |
| 6 | Lorentzian-Fit + gradient | 0.627 | 24.75 | 0.794 |
| 7 | U-Net-CEST + gradient | 0.620 | 24.54 | 0.787 |
| 8 | MTR-asym + gradient | 0.543 | 21.04 | 0.647 |
| 9 | DnCNN-CEST + gradient | 0.497 | 19.77 | 0.588 |
Spec Ranges (4 parameters)
| Parameter | Min | Max | Unit |
|---|---|---|---|
| b0_inhomogeneity | -7.0 | 23.0 | Hz |
| b1_inhomogeneity | -2.8 | 9.2 | - |
| saturation_power_error | -1.4 | 4.6 | - |
| mt_contamination | -4.2 | 13.8 | - |
Blind Reconstruction Challenge
ChallengeGiven measurements with unknown mismatch and spec ranges (not exact params), reconstruct the original signal. A method must be evaluated on all three tiers for a complete score. Scored on a composite metric: 0.4 × PSNR_norm + 0.4 × SSIM + 0.2 × (1 − ‖y − Ĥx̂‖/‖y‖).
Measurements y, ideal forward model H, spec ranges
Reconstructed signal x̂
Spec DAG — Forward Model Pipeline
M → F → S → D
Mismatch Parameters
| Symbol | Parameter | Description | Nominal | Perturbed |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| b_i | b0_inhomogeneity | B0 inhomogeneity (Hz) | 0.0 | 10.0 |
| b_i | b1_inhomogeneity | B1 inhomogeneity (-) | 0.0 | 4.0 |
| s_p | saturation_power_error | Saturation power error (-) | 0.0 | 2.0 |
| m_c | mt_contamination | MT contamination (-) | 0.0 | 6.0 |
Credits System
Spec Primitives Reference (11 primitives)
Free-space or medium propagation kernel (Fresnel, Rayleigh-Sommerfeld).
Spatial or spatio-temporal amplitude modulation (coded aperture, SLM pattern).
Geometric projection operator (Radon transform, fan-beam, cone-beam).
Sampling in the Fourier / k-space domain (MRI, ptychography).
Shift-invariant convolution with a point-spread function (PSF).
Summation along a physical dimension (spectral, temporal, angular).
Sensor readout with gain g and noise model η (Gaussian, Poisson, mixed).
Patterned illumination (block, Hadamard, random) applied to the scene.
Spectral dispersion element (prism, grating) with shift α and aperture a.
Sample or gantry rotation (CT, electron tomography).
Spectral filter or monochromator selecting a wavelength band.