Hidden
Cathodoluminescence (CL) Imaging — Hidden Tier
(5 scenes)Fully blind server-side evaluation — no data download.
What you get
No data downloadable. Algorithm runs server-side on hidden measurements.
How to use
Package algorithm as Docker container / Python script. Submit via link.
What to submit
Containerized algorithm accepting y + H, outputting x_hat + corrected spec.
Parameter Specifications
🔒
True spec hidden — blind evaluation, only ranges available.
| Parameter | Spec Range | Unit |
|---|---|---|
| beam_current_drift | -0.7 – 2.3 | - |
| collection_efficiency_variation | -2.8 – 9.2 | spatial |
| spectral_calibration_error | -0.28 – 0.92 | nm |
| carbon_contamination | -1.4 – 4.6 | signalloss |
Hidden Tier Leaderboard
| # | Method | Score | PSNR | SSIM | Consistency | Trust | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Restormer-CL + gradient | 0.762 | 31.76 | 0.94 | 0.84 | ✓ Certified | Zamir et al., CVPR 2022 (CL adapted) |
| 2 | PINN-CL + gradient | 0.680 | 27.63 | 0.873 | 0.77 | ✓ Certified | Raissi et al., J. Comput. Phys. 2019 (CL) |
| 3 | SwinIR-CL + gradient | 0.667 | 25.93 | 0.83 | 0.88 | ✓ Certified | Liang et al., ICCV 2021 (CL adapted) |
| 4 | CARE-CL + gradient | 0.666 | 26.62 | 0.849 | 0.8 | ✓ Certified | Weigert et al., Nat. Methods 2018 (CL adapted) |
| 5 | DiffusionEM + gradient | 0.650 | 25.5 | 0.818 | 0.84 | ✓ Certified | Gao et al., Nat. Methods 2024 (EM adapted) |
| 6 | Richardson-Lucy + gradient | 0.640 | 25.3 | 0.812 | 0.81 | ✓ Certified | Richardson, J. Opt. Soc. Am. 1972 |
| 7 | U-Net-CL + gradient | 0.617 | 24.75 | 0.794 | 0.76 | ✓ Certified | Ronneberger et al., MICCAI 2015 (CL adapted) |
| 8 | DnCNN-CL + gradient | 0.579 | 22.56 | 0.713 | 0.84 | ✓ Certified | Zhang et al., IEEE TIP 2017 (CL adapted) |
| 9 | Wiener-CL + gradient | 0.526 | 20.5 | 0.622 | 0.86 | ✓ Certified | Castleman, Digital Image Processing, 1996 |
Dataset
Scenes: 5
Scoring Formula
0.4 × PSNR_norm + 0.4 × SSIM + 0.2 × (1 − ‖y − Ĥx̂‖/‖y‖)
PSNR: 40%
SSIM: 40%
Consistency: 20%