Dev
Coherent Anti-Stokes Raman (CARS) Microscopy — Dev Tier
(5 scenes)Blind evaluation tier — no ground truth available.
What you get
Measurements (y), ideal forward operator (H), and spec ranges only.
How to use
Apply your pipeline from the Public tier. Use consistency as self-check.
What to submit
Reconstructed signals and corrected spec. Scored server-side.
Parameter Specifications
🔒
True spec hidden — estimate parameters from spec ranges below.
| Parameter | Spec Range | Unit |
|---|---|---|
| pump_stokes_frequency_offset | -1.2 – 1.8 | cm^-1 |
| non_resonant_background | -12.0 – 18.0 | - |
| chirp_mismatch | -120.0 – 180.0 | fs^2 |
Dev Tier Leaderboard
| # | Method | Score | PSNR | SSIM | Consistency | Trust | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | FMDiff-CARS + gradient | 0.764 | 31.65 | 0.939 | 0.86 | ✓ Certified | Li et al., NeurIPS 2024 |
| 2 | SpecFormer-CARS + gradient | 0.751 | 31.82 | 0.941 | 0.78 | ✓ Certified | Liao et al., Light Sci. Appl. 2023 |
| 3 | ResNet-CARS + gradient | 0.731 | 29.74 | 0.913 | 0.84 | ✓ Certified | Ying et al., Optica 2022 |
| 4 | Diff-CARS + gradient | 0.703 | 28.49 | 0.891 | 0.81 | ✓ Certified | Zhang et al., Nat. Methods 2024 |
| 5 | PINN-CARS + gradient | 0.665 | 26.66 | 0.85 | 0.79 | ✓ Certified | Bae et al., ACS Photonics 2021 |
| 6 | CNN-NRB + gradient | 0.626 | 24.59 | 0.789 | 0.82 | ✓ Certified | Houhou et al., Chem. Sci. 2020 |
| 7 | U-Net-CARS + gradient | 0.608 | 23.22 | 0.74 | 0.9 | ✓ Certified | Manifold et al., Nat. Mach. Intell. 2021 |
| 8 | MEM-CARS + gradient | 0.601 | 23.25 | 0.741 | 0.86 | ✓ Certified | Rinia et al., J. Raman Spectrosc. 2008 |
| 9 | KK-Retrieval + gradient | 0.575 | 22.64 | 0.717 | 0.81 | ✓ Certified | Liu et al., Opt. Express 2009 |
Visible Data Fields
y
H_ideal
spec_ranges
Dataset
Format: HDF5
Scenes: 5
Scoring Formula
0.4 × PSNR_norm + 0.4 × SSIM + 0.2 × (1 − ‖y − Ĥx̂‖/‖y‖)
PSNR: 40%
SSIM: 40%
Consistency: 20%